First of all there were the five Bishops in the House of Lords who defied the Government and (if reports are correct) public opinion to oppose plans for a £26,000 cap on Benefits.
Then blast from the past, retired Archbishop George Carey,
waded in with an article
for the Daily Mail which was a scathing attack on the hapless Bishops
mentioned above. In it he called into
question their judgment, perspectives on morality and use of the Bible. He also practically canonised the relevant Government minister because he is
a 'Committed Christian' - after all, God forbid that committed Christians
should ever disagree!
Lord Carey has of course, every right as a member of the
House of Lords, to contribute to the debate in the House of Lords - but he did
not. He chose instead to make his
contribution in the pages of the Daily Mail giving them the front page headline
"Halleluiah! Archbishop blasts
clerics who oppose welfare reform!"
Nicely done Archbishop!
But the most shocking statement by a Bishop was brought to
my attention by another Bishop who tweeted it with disbelief! And shocking it was...
It was the observation that Bishop
Wallace Benn (current Bishop of Lewes) has endorsed a book by Christian
Voice fundamentalist Stephen Green.
The book "Britain in Sin"
charts 57 pieces of legislation which the Queen has signed which are
bringing God's judgment on Britain because they oppose the clear teaching of
scripture. Such unbiblical legislation
includes recognition of marital rape, equal pay for women, the United Nations
Charter, and the European Convention on Human Rights.
Coincidentally, another piece of legislation which Stephen
Green describes as unbiblical is the creation of state social security. Apparently, it goes against God's law because
it "penalises thrift and
marriage and rewards fecklessness and isolation." (page 9 of the pdf download of the
book). Disturbingly, Lord Carey
also uses a similar phrase in his article for the Daily Mail stating that the
welfare state, "traps people into dependency and rewards fecklessness and irresponsibility."
So
why is the 'focus of unity ' issue so important that it is being used to deny
celibate gay clergy in Civil Partnerships from becoming
Bishops ?
It is
hard to imagine that Bishop Wallace Benn's endorsement of 'Britain in Sin' will
be enable him to be a 'focus of unity' in the diocese where he serves, anymore
that we can pretend that the Bishops in the Lords are at one with Lord Carey.
Our Bishops
can be pro-government or anti-government.
They can be pro-women's ministry or anti-women's ministry. They can even endorse books which would
outrage the vast majority of Christians and society at large - but they can't
be openly gay - even if they promise to abide by the churches repressive
teachings.
Shocking
- Bishops!Update:
Since I wrote this blog I am pleased to hear that Bishop Wallace Benn has dissassociated himself from Stephen Green's book in a statment which implies that he didn't read it fully before endorsing it! See http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/16147
While this is clearly welcome it is still shocking that he should have thought he could endorse the book at all. It makes me wonder which parts had he read and could endorse!
No comments:
Post a Comment