The news that Cornish B&B owners have been successfully sued for discriminating against gay guests is likely to reinforce the growing accusations that the right to practise our Christian faith are being eroded or challenged in the UK. Groups like Christian Concern have highlighted this in speaking out in support of Christians who feel their right to religious freedom been challenged by equality laws designed to uphold the rights of homosexuals. These include the Relate counsellor who lost his job after refusing to counsel homosexual couples, a registrar who refused to officiate Civil Partnerships and the B&B owners, Peter and Hazelmary Bull. In the words of Christian Concern, such laws have "led to Christians losing their jobs after refusing to compromise their beliefs at work".
Whilst I have every sympathy with those whose faith puts them in situations where they face moral dilemmas, I can't help wonder why some seem to single out homosexuality for this kind of Christian conscientious objection whilst ignoring other moral dilemmas.
There is, of course, a proud history of conscientious objection in this country. My wife's grandfather was a pacifist and conscientious objector in the second world war, and suffered for it in prison. His pacifism was rooted in his Christian faith, and he stood up for what he believed.
There are also many Christians who rightly choose not to work directly in areas where they feel that their faith and their job would be in conflict - whether it be in the arms trade, adult entertainment, gambling, or some areas of medical research.
But that is entirely different to the moral dilemmas which face many Christians in ordinary, day to day jobs, and which Christians almost universally accept (sometimes with a heavy heart) as inevitable in a 'free' society.
Examples might include the shop assistant in a newsagent who is faced with a customer buying a 'top shelf' pornographic magazine. The Roman Catholic pharmacist who is asked to supply contraception. The taxi driver picking up a customer who asks to be taken to an abortion clinic. The stock broker or fund manager who is required to buy shares in companies with questionable records in the arms trade, environment, human rights or third world exploitation. All of these situations could involve a Christian being asked to facilitate something which they might find morally wrong or questionable.
Years ago when I was a motorbike despatch rider in London, I often felt compromised by the company I worked for. They charged more than anyone else for the letters we delivered, on the basis that each courier would only have one letter on board at any one time. This was completely untrue of course, and we were often juggling several deliveries at the same time. Sometimes, a particularly astute customer would ask for reassurance when I picked up an urgent letter. "You don't have any other jobs on board, do you?" was the standard question - and it placed me, as a Christian, in a dilemma. I could lie and keep everyone happy, or tell the truth and lose my job. In the end I found a way of fudging the issue, and my standard answer when challenged became "That's what you are paying for!" which was true, even if it wasn't truth-ful.
The point is this. Christians often end up facing issues of compromise at work. That is simply the way life is.
Now perhaps we should be less compromising. Perhaps we should be more ready to witness to our Christian faith by refusing to do anything that goes against our religious beliefs. Perhaps we should be campaigning for the right to Christian conscientious objection in every moral area of life - including other areas where Christians don't always agree (like pacifism, contraception, and the stock market).
But at the moment, it appears that almost all the 'conscientious objectors' whose cases are being highlighted by groups like Christian Concern and the Christian Legal Centre are related to homosexuality. I don't see campaigns to encourage Christian shop assistants, taxi drivers, pharmacists & stockbrokers to stand up for their faith in the moral dilemmas they face. All I see are a minority of Christians who want the right to single out homosexuals as the one group worthy of such conscientious objection, because for some strange reason, homosexuality is worse than all the rest.
Unless those same Christian groups encourage a policy of refusal for the full range of situations where faith creates moral dilemmas, it will not be seen as principled action to uphold freedom of religion - just prejudice.
PS. I found the picture to illustrate this blog on a campaign site called "Stop Gay Marriages". They descibe their cause in the following way, "without gays the world would be a better place we need to stop all gays marriages. they are absuly wrong and horrible". Enough said ?
