This has
been an extra-ordinary week in the debate on same-sex partnerships in England
and Wales.
First the Archbishop of Wales made same-sex partnerships the subject of his Presidential Address to the Church in Wales Governing Body.
He said that the church needed to find
ways to be good news to gay people and that they should not be treated as
second class citizens in church. He also
recognised that there is no single Christian opinion on sexuality.
Turning to the Government consultation
on same-sex marriage, he became the first Archbishop in the UK to say that we
should engage with the idea of same-sex marriage rather than simply opposing it,
“If the legislation to allow civil marriage is
passed, I cannot see how we as a church, will be able to ignore the legality of
the status of such partnerships and we ought not to want to do so.
“The question then as now is, will the church protect
and support pastorally, faithful, stable, lifelong relationships of whatever
kind in order to encourage human values such as love and fidelity and recognise
the need in Christian people for some public religious support for these.”
Then on Saturday morning, the Times
newspaper published a letter from 15 leading members of the Church of
England including 5 Bishops saying that the church
has nothing to fear from Civil Marriage for same-sex couples and calls for
theological discussion and prayerful reflection on the nature of marriage.
“Marriage is a robust
institution which has adapted much over the centuries. It has moved beyond the
polygamy of the Old Testament and preoccupation with social status and property
in pre-Enlightenment times.
While the Prayer Book
states that marriage was ordained first for ‘the procreation of children’ the
modern marriage service begins by emphasising the quality of relationship
between marriage partners ‘that they shall be united with one another in heart,
body and mind.’
The Church calls
marriage holy or sacramental because the covenant relationship of committed,
faithful love between the couple reflects the covenanted love and commitment
between God and his Church. Growing in this kind of love means we are growing
in the image of God. So the fact that there are same-sex couples who want to
embrace marriage should be a cause for rejoicing in the Christian Church.”
And then
later the same day, The Bishop
of Salisbury made a major speech to the Cutting Edge Consortium in
London in which he said that "it is
disaster that we have allowed the Church to be seen as the opposition to equal
civil marriage."
“There
is an evangelical imperative for the Church to recognise that covenantal same sex
relationships can be Godly and good for individuals and society; that they are
at least
like marriage for heterosexuals, and this is a development that many Christians in good faith warmly welcome.”
So what are we to make of all this?
For some time now, it has been
relatively easy to have private conversations with Bishops and other senior church
leaders where they have expressed private support for same-sex couples. What has not been possible until recently was
to get them to say so in public.
Indeed a network exercise I took part in recently found evidence that
almost half of the House of Bishops are personally open to a change in church
teaching on sexuality, but a combination of loyalty and fear keeps them from
saying so openly.
Pressure is now growing behind the dam
wall of silence and holes are appearing in the façade of uniformity which the
Church of England has erected. People
are starting to speak out - the debate is beginning to change. How many more holes will it take before the
dam starts to collapse – who knows?
But the cracks are showing as the
water of honesty begins to flow.
I hope that this week’s events will
encourage others to be more honest and open in their doubts about the church’s
current teaching on homosexuality – I hope it will inspire others to speak out
and be counted. After this week, they
will know that if they do, they will no longer be a lone voice in the
wilderness, but part of a move of God’s Spirit.
Is the dam beginning to break? Oh I do hope so. I also hope you might forgive my - premature! - blog post with the same idea - The Tipping Point at http://www.layanglicana.org/blog/2012/02/06/the-tipping-point/
ReplyDeleteIf we are to have a Spring in the Anglican Church, it will not be like the October Revolution of 1917: I foresee no storming of Lambeth Palace, its residents may be relieved to hear. The nature of the revolution (and, if it comes, it will be a revolution, not a mere revolt) is more akin to the wisdom of the Eastern book, the I Ching: The overlapping hexagrams 39 and 55 read:
“An obstruction that lasts only for a time is useful for self-development. That is the value of adversity…the obstruction is overcome not by pressing forward into danger, nor by idly keeping still, but by retreating, yielding…water on the top of a mountain cannot flow down in accordance with its nature, because rocks hinder it. It must stand still. This causes it to increase, and the inner accumulation finally becomes so great that it overflows the barriers. The way of overcoming obstacles lies in turning inward and raising one’s own being to a higher level.”
I pay tribute to my fellow-campaigners, who have almost universally had the spiritual strength not to storm the barricades, but to retreat and yield until the water should reach a higher level. But has that moment finally come? Is it premature to dream of singing in unison Beethoven’s ‘Ode to Joy‘ (which needs liberating from its EU national anthem status to an expression of heavenly ecstasy as intended)? Will Hyde Park be big enough to contain us all for a big sing, do you think?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete